Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology

Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology

Artificial Intelligence in Reservoir Characterization: Predicting Shale Volume with ANN, RF, and ET

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Faculty of Petroleum, Gas, and Petrochemical Engineering, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
2 Persian Gulf University
10.22034/jogpt.2025.527316.1141
Abstract
Shale volumes are essential for lithology identification, reservoir evaluation, and stratigraphic correlation in subsurface formation analysis. This study evaluates the performance of three machine learning algorithms—Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)—for shale volume prediction using conventional well log data. The models were trained and tested on a comprehensive dataset from one of the oil fields in southern Iran, incorporating parameters such as sonic travel time (DTC), bulk density (RHOZ), resistivity (RT), neutron porosity (HTNP), and caliper (HCAL). Results demonstrated that ANN achieved superior accuracy with an R² of 0.9779 and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.0130 API, outperforming both RF (R² = 0.9640, RMSE = 0.0166 API) and ET (R² = 0.9007, RMSE = 0.0275 API). While ANN excelled in capturing complex nonlinear relationships, tree-based methods offered faster training times and greater interpretability through feature importance metrics. The findings highlight ANN as the preferred choice for high-fidelity shale volume prediction, whereas RF provides a balanced solution for scenarios requiring both speed and competitive accuracy. This study underscores the transformative potential of machine learning in petrophysical analysis, offering practical recommendations for model selection based on project-specific needs.
Keywords

[1]  Bettir, N., et al. Improved Shale Volume Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Complex Reservoirs. in ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. 2024. ARMA.
[2]  Ma, Y., et al., Influence of Rock Fabric on Physical Properties of Shale Oil Reservoir Under Effective Pressure Conditions. Lithosphere, 2024. 2024(2): p. lithosphere_2023_338.
[3]  Mabiala Mbouaki, A.P., et al., Petrophysical Evaluation of a Shaly Sandstone Reservoir and the Effect of Clay Minerals on Reservoir Quality: A Case Study from the Barremian Mengo Sandstone, Kouilou Basin, Republic of Congo. ACS omega, 2025. 10(10): p. 10081-10106.
[4]  Ganguli, S.S. and V.P. Dimri, Reservoir Characterization, Modeling and Quantitative Interpretation: Recent Workflows to Emerging Technologies. Vol. 6. 2023: Elsevier.
[5]  Bin, W., et al., Experimental study on hydraulic fracture propagation behavior in heterogeneous shale formations. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2024. 11: p. 1309591.
[6]  Gong, X., X. Ma, and Y. Liu, Analysis of geological factors affecting propagation behavior of fracture during hydraulic fracturing shale formation. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources, 2024. 10(1): p. 102.
[7]  Belyadi, H., E. Fathi, and F. Belyadi, Hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs: theories, operations, and economic analysis. 2019: Gulf Professional Publishing.
[8]  Asquith, G.B. and C.R. Gibosn, Basic well log analysis for geologists. 1982: American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
[9]  Vu, D.H. and H.T. Nguyen, Estimation of shale volume from well logging data using Artificial Neural Network. Tạp chí Khoa học kỹ thuật Mỏ-Địa chất, 2021: p. 46-52.
[10]       Szabó, N.P., Shale volume estimation based on the factor analysis of well-logging data. Acta Geophysica, 2011. 59: p. 935-953.
[11]       Zhang, H. and W. Wu, Shale content prediction of well logs based on CNN-BiGRU-VAE neural network. Journal of Earth System Science, 2023. 132(3): p. 139.
[12]       Ebrahimi, P., et al., Shale volume estimation using machine learning methods from the southwestern fields of Iran. Results in Engineering, 2025. 25: p. 104506.
[13]       Dehghani, M., S. Jahani, and A. Ranjbar, Comparing the performance of machine learning methods in estimating the shear wave transit time in one of the reservoirs in southwest of Iran. Scientific Reports, 2024. 14(1): p. 4744.
[14]       Mondal, D., V. Srivardhan, and B. Singh. A Wavelet and Neural Network based approach towards determination of Shale Volume using well logs of Indian Coalfields. in 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2017. 2017. EAGE Publications BV.
[15]       Mohammadinia, F., et al., Shale volume estimation using ANN, SVR, and RF algorithms compared with conventional methods. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2023. 205: p. 104991.
[16]       Ardebili, P.N., G. Jozanikohan, and A. Moradzadeh, Estimation of porosity and volume of shale using artificial intelligence, case study of Kashafrud Gas Reservoir, NE Iran. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2024. 14(2): p. 477-494.
[17]       Huang, S., et al., Support vector regression based on the particle swarm optimization algorithm for tight oil recovery prediction. ACS omega, 2021. 6(47): p. 32142-32150.
[18]       Meng, Y., et al., Prediction of Total Organic Carbon Content in Shale Based on PCA-PSO-XGBoost. Applied Sciences, 2025. 15(7): p. 3447.
[19]       Wang, T., et al., Productivity prediction of fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoirs with machine learning algorithms. Applied Sciences, 2021. 11(24): p. 12064.
[20]       Yang, R., et al., Long short-term memory suggests a model for predicting shale gas production. Applied Energy, 2022. 322: p. 119415.
[21]       Garcia-Cifuentes, K., et al., Identification of Extended Emission Gamma-Ray Burst Candidates Using Machine Learning. The Astrophysical Journal, 2023. 951(1): p. 4.
[22]       Gao, P., et al., Influence of dispersion and stabilization of active metals on Ni-Cu/AC catalyst on gas phase carbonylation of ethanol. Fuel, 2021. 292: p. 120308.
[23]       Ye, L., et al., Application of machine learning in cosmic ray particle identification. ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2023. 72(14).
[24]       Kuran, F., G. Tanırcan, and E. Pashaei, Developing machine learning-based ground motion models to predict peak ground velocity in Turkiye. Journal of Seismology, 2024. 28(5): p. 1183-1204.
[25]       Ali, M., Machine learning based shale volume prediction from the Norwegian North Sea. 2021, uis.
[26]       Han, D. and S. Kwon, Application of machine learning method of data-driven deep learning model to predict well production rate in the shale gas reservoirs. Energies, 2021. 14(12): p. 3629.
[27]       Rezaei Mirghaed, B., A. Dehghan Monfared, and A. Ranjbar, Enhanced petrophysical evaluation through machine learning and well logging data in an Iranian oil field. Scientific Reports, 2024. 14(1): p. 28941.
[28]       Breiman, L., Random forests. Machine learning, 2001. 45: p. 5-32.
[29]       Geurts, P., D. Ernst, and L. Wehenkel, Extremely randomized trees. Machine learning, 2006. 63: p. 3-42.
[30]       Goodfellow, I., et al., Deep learning. Vol. 1. 2016: MIT press Cambridge.
[31]       Friedman, J., T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). The annals of statistics, 2000. 28(2): p. 337-407.
[32]       Hastie, T., et al., Random forests. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction, 2009: p. 587-604.
[33]       Liaw, A. and M. Wiener, Classification and regression by randomForest. R news, 2002. 2(3): p. 18-22.
[34]       Ho, T.K., The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 1998. 20(8): p. 832-844.
[35]       Pal, M., Random forest classifier for remote sensing classification. International journal of remote sensing, 2005. 26(1): p. 217-222.
[36]       Quinlan, J.R., Induction of decision trees. Machine learning, 1986. 1: p. 81-106.
[37]       Loh, W.Y., Classification and regression trees. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: data mining and knowledge discovery, 2011. 1(1): p. 14-23.
[38]       Kononenko, I., Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective. Artificial Intelligence in medicine, 2001. 23(1): p. 89-109.
[39]       Pedregosa, F., et al., Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 2011. 12: p. 2825-2830.
[40]       Srivastava, N., et al., Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The journal of machine learning research, 2014. 15(1): p. 1929-1958.
[41]       Goodfellow, I., Deep learning. 2016, MIT press.
[42]       Goodfellow, I.J., et al., An empirical investigation of catastrophic forgetting in gradient-based neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6211, 2013.
[43]       Nair, V. and G.E. Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. in Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10). 2010.
[44]       Géron, A., Hands-on machine learning with scikit-learn, keras, and tensorflow: concepts. Aurélien Géron-Google Kitaplar, yy https://books. google. com. tr/books, 2019.
[45]       Duda, R.O. and P.E. Hart, Pattern classification. 2006: John Wiley & Sons.
[46]       Kingma, D.P., Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
[47]       Chicco, D., M.J. Warrens, and G. Jurman, The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. Peerj computer science, 2021. 7: p. e623.
[48]       Willmott, C.J. and K. Matsuura, Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate research, 2005. 30(1): p. 79-82.
[49]       Ebrahimi, A., et al., Estimation of shear wave velocity in an Iranian oil reservoir using machine learning methods. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022. 209: p. 109841.
[50]       Ebrahimi, P., et al., Young’s Modulus Estimation Using Machine Learning Methods and Daily Drilling Reports. Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology, 2023. 10(1): p. 1-24.
[51]       Akbari, A., et al., Enhanced water saturation estimation in hydrocarbon reservoirs using machine learning. Scientific Reports, 2025. 15(1): p. 29846.