Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology

Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology

Impact of Anisotropic Permeability on Oil Recovery Using SP Flooding: A Simulation Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
Rohan Jindal
Arunima Singh
Amit Saxena
Department of Petroleum Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Petroleum Technology
10.22034/jogpt.2021.133839
Abstract
The study of flow through porous media has been of cardinal gravity in various oil and gas applications like enhanced oil recovery (EOR), acidizing, fracturing, etc. In apprehension to this need, core modeling has become prevalent to understand the flow through porous media. Hence, our study is aimed at simulating and analyzing the effect of surfactant flooding through anisotropic permeability conditions in a subsurface environment.
The simulations were carried out on a 2-D model of the experimental core and were finely meshed for the better convergence. The natural anionic surfactant extracted from Madhuca longifolia oil and Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacryl Amide polymer referenced for the physicochemical properties were used in the simulations. Several sets of directional permeabilities were introduced vertically and horizontally for a single absolute permeability and porosity system.
Results indicated to a trend of oil recovery upright with increasing vertical permeability. A lower areal sweep efficiency and early breakthrough were observed in models with high horizontal permeabilities.
With the ingress of computational fluid dynamics in the oil and gas industry, a more comprehensive understanding of flow patterns allows improved EOR process designs. Our research exploited this to model the multiphase flow through an anisotropic permeability medium and its effect on the oil recovery.
 
Keywords
Anisotropic Permeability
Surfactant Polymer Flooding
Computational Fluid
Dynamics Enhanced Oil Recovery
Core Modelling
Volumetric Displacement Efficiency
Oil Recovery Rate
[1]           J. R. Fanchi, “Directional permeability,” SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 565–568, 2008, doi: 10.2118/102343-pa.
[2]           G. S. Shiralkar, “Reservoir simulation of generally anisotropic systems.,” no. August, pp. 409–414, 1989.
[3]           W. F. Leung, “A Tensor Model for Anisotropic and Heterogeneous Reservoirs With Variable Directional Permeabilities,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 1986.
[4]           J. J. Sheng, “Status of surfactant EOR technology,” Petroleum, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 97–105, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.petlm.2015.07.003.
[5]           C. Negin, S. Ali, and Q. Xie, “Most common surfactants employed in chemical enhanced oil recovery,” Petroleum, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 197–211, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.petlm.2016.11.007.
[6]           A. Lohne and I. Fjelde, “Surfactant flooding in heterogeneous formations,” SPE - DOE Improv. Oil Recover. Symp. Proc., vol. 2, no. April, pp. 1093–1111, 2012, doi: 10.2118/154178-ms.
[7]           F. Taqi et al., “Interference pressure transient test for permeability anisotropy evaluation in shallow unconsolidated reservoir undergoing EOR polymer flood pilot,” Oct. 2019, doi: 10.2118/198100-ms.
[8]           E. Gharaibah, A. Read, and G. Scheuerer, “Overview of CFD multiphase flow simulation tools for subsea oil and gas system design, optimization and operation,” OTC Bras. 2015 Atl. From East to West - An Ocean Innov., pp. 2291–2306, 2015, doi: 10.4043/26326-ms.
[9]           M. Sivagnanam, J. Wang, and I. D. Gates, “On the fluid mechanics of slotted liners in horizontal wells,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 164, pp. 23–33, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.070.
[10]         E. Marsis and R. Russell, “A state-of-the-art computational fluid dynamics simulation for erosion rates prediction in a bottom hole electrical submersible pump,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Heavy Oil Conf. Canada 2013, vol. 2, no. Mikielewicz 1978, pp. 802–815, 2013, doi: 10.2118/165452-ms.
[11]         H. I. Bilgesu, N. Mishra, and S. Ameri, “Understanding the Effect of Drilling Parameters on Hole Cleaning in Horizontal and Deviated Wellbores Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” pp. 2–8, 2007.
[12]         S. K. Nandwani, M. Chakraborty, and S. Gupta, “Chemical flooding with ionic liquid and nonionic surfactant mixture in artificially prepared carbonate cores: A diffusion controlled CFD simulation,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 173, pp. 835–843, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.083.
[13]         N. Saxena, A. Saxena, and A. Mandal, “Synthesis, characterization and enhanced oil recovery potential analysis through simulation of a natural anionic surfactant,” J. Mol. Liq., vol. 282, pp. 545–556, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.03.056.
[14]         Y. Murakami, T. Namba, and N. Yamazaki, “Practical and robust simulation for anisotropic reservoirs,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Asia Pacific Oil Gas Conf. Exhib. 1999, APOGCE 1999, 1999, doi: 10.2118/54334-ms.
[15]         A. Goudarzi, M. Delshad, K. K. Mohanty, and K. Sepehrnoori, “Surfactant oil recovery in fractured carbonates: Experiments and modeling of different matrix dimensions,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 125, pp. 136–145, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.11.008.
[16]         A. Singh, R. Jindal, and A. Saxena, “Simulation and determination of optimal variables for increased oil recovery potential of surfactant polymer flooding,” Offshore Technol. Conf. Asia 2020, OTCA 2020, 2020, doi: 10.4043/30035-ms.
[17]         M. Latil, “Enhanced Oil Recovery,” Technip 27., Paris, France: Editions TECHNIP, 1980, pp. 6–7.
Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Technology
Volume 8, Number 1
June 2021
Pages 44-54